I quit mom blogs today.

Goodbye.

For longer than I’d like to admit, I’ve had a folder on my Google Reader named “mom blogs” where pictures of cupcakes, strollers, and babies dominated. As a result, I’ve also helped (a little) in making these blogs a success.

I still can’t really articulate what I find so fascinating about these women. Most of the time, I did not find myself relating to their lives at all, and I’m pretty sure I don’t share the same political views as these women. Maybe it’s because their lives seemed so simple, so pretty (and full of pretty things), and so absent of conflict or  turmoil that I found it incomprehensible yet intriguing. And those pictures of babies are pretty cute too, though the thought of becoming a mother myself is still a bit terrifying.

In sum: certain popular “mom” blogs had become a bit of an embarrassing guilty pleasure / “hate-read” that my friends and loved ones liked to gently mock. Sometimes I’d go into a phase where I got too busy or too weirded out so I’d stop checking them. But they still remained in my Reader.

But today, I deleted the “mom blog” category from my Reader altogether, and I’m here to tell you about my embarrassing habit.

I always felt uneasy, being someone who identifies as a feminist, to read about something that can only be described as heightened performance of traditional femininity (the smiling babies, adoring looks to husbands, dresses, cupcakes, etc). Thankfully, I found out a while ago I was not the only feminist-identified person who reads these blogs (which made me feel okay about my dirty habit). But recently, my unease got to a new level when I recently watched a strange “sponsored video” that a very famous mom blogger made, featuring her baby holding ridiculous instruction signs like “MIX INGREDIENTS TOGETHER” with a smile.

Sure, I’ve seen more blatant signs of capitalism before; I’m not naive. But somehow, this particular video just rubbed me the wrong way. I understand a baby’s cuteness has indirectly led to making money for the blog and attracting sponsors. But implicating an infant so blatantly into a directly sponsored content without his or her real consent or cognizance was really jarring.  On the scale of parents exploiting their children, this incident does not place very highly, but it was still a trigger that made me reflect on this habit of mine. I started thinking about the concept of the “mom blog economy” where I, as a reader, am making these women money by clicking and subscribing to the updates of their highly traditional, feminized, and very materialistic lifestyle.

I don’t mean to paint the category of “mom blogs” with broad strokes. There are blogs written by mothers that are more thoughtful and politically engaged, and offer honest reflections and hardships of being a working parent. While I had read the aforementioned progressive mom blogs occasionally, they were not read as frequently as the other ones with pretty pictures.

The emblematic of “mom blogs” are not the ones with words and nuance, but rather, pretty pictures by (white) rich people. This is not an original insight and I am certainly not the first one to raise the privileged nature of successful bloggers, but it’s something I have become complicit in as a reader, despite my justification of my habits as “ironic” or “guilty pleasures” or whatever else I said to other people.

The loss of one subscriber will mean nothing to such a popular blogs. And I’m not even sure why I’m writing this, because I don’t think what I said would affect these popular bloggers in any way.Instead, someone will inevitably say to me: “calm down, these are just blogs! If you don’t like what you read, just don’t read it”. And that’s exactly it — these are just blogs, and I should spend my precious time and energy on other things that make me feel less guilty, and more fulfilled.

About these ads
Leave a comment

3 Comments

  1. I don’t read mommy blogs, but I see similar things happening with fashion blogs where the most popular ones are of privileged, super-thin, model-esque. Strange that blogs are supposed to democratize things, yet we as a public are drawn to the same things we’re spoon-fed via the media all the time :p

    Reply
  2. I’d say that the large majority of personal blogs are guilting of snapshotting the good bits of life and glossing over the bad. For the sake of privacy, I can understand this.

    …but the idea of using your child to generate web traffic…a little harder to swallow.

    Either way, props for removing a source of guilt from your life.

    Reply
  3. @Alex, yeah, I indulge in the escapism offered by personal blogs as well, and I’m not saying I’d enjoy someone griping about their lives all the time. I suppose I’m sounding a bit curmudgeon-y when I say “BUT NOT THE CHILDREN!” Yet….I guess that’s how I feel.

    @J — true! That’s why people like you campaigning for more real images is important :)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 942 other followers

%d bloggers like this: