K-Town reality show: ain’t no Jersey Shore

I love television shows. I’m also keen on seeing more Asian representations on television. So when K-Town  (aka Jersey Shore for Asians) finally made its online debut after casting changes and delays, I had to watch it, of course.

The result?

Ehhhh.

Lots of drinking, hair-pulling, drinks being thrown, etc. What else did I expect?

Despite my reservations, I dutifully introduced this show to another Asian Canadian friend, and we ended up having a K-Town marathon on her big-screen TV. After binging on the drama, we inevitably asked ourselves the question that many people have asked about this show: Is this show good for Asian Americans?

Ehhhh.

I mostly find the men’s portrayal on the show more interesting than the women’s, mainly because we don’t see many Asians in “jock” or “partier” (or I might even say “ditz” if I’m feeling mean) roles. It’s also kind of refreshing to see a host of Asian Americans existing as an entire world, rather than as tokens in a white-washed one of mainstream television. It has the Asians: they’re just like us! effect. Even if that “just like us” message is geared towards…shirtlessness and belligerence. (note: the pictures from the Disgrasian link feature some of the old cast members, who are no longer on the current version of the show)

Then again, K-Town’s failed distribution deal with MTV is perhaps telling of the racial landscape of television — whereas Italian Americans were seen as capable of capturing a wider audience, Asian Americans are not there yet.

But race might not be the only factor that hindered its success. In my opinion, there is a general absence of heightened drama in K-Town that prevent it from being a true guilty pleasure. From what I can tell, the show (as it is now, after some casting changes) seems to consist mostly of friends who knew each other before, besides a couple of additions. This gives the viewer a sense of intruding upon something that was already established, rather than growing with new relationships. MTV shows got this down pat, with The Real World as well as Jersey Shore – where a bunch of strangers came to live in one place for a designated purpose of drama for the camera. This helped the viewer to feel like s/he was a part of this relationship.

Also, house footages  on Jersey Shore helped to add that dimension of intimacy — something K-Town also lacks. So really, watching K-Town is like watching loud and obnoxious people at a club, something I try to avoid in real life. I’ve seen obnoxious crowds before, so there’s nothing new there. But Jersey Shore gave me something more exclusive, behind-the-scenes workings of an obnoxious crowd (which I don’t get to see). This didn’t necessarily help me understand or empathize with them any more, but there have been the occasional moments of tenderness or friendship that have surprised me. I can’t say the same for K-Town, really.

So will I keep watching? Three episodes later, I remain unconvinced — but it is vacation time for me after all, so who knows?

(If you’re interested in learning more about the show, Schema has weekly updates as well as Twitter chats when new episodes air every Wednesday.)

On street harassment

Laura’s post on staring men has made me think a lot about street harassment and uninvited attention/invitation from men on the street.

I’ve been verbally harassed many times on the street. The only time where I came close to being physically assaulted was in the Paris metro, and that was just a few aggressive pokes on the shoulder. I know how lucky I am to have only brushed against the idea of being physically assaulted, rather than experiencing physical assault.  I guess I shouldn’t have such high expectations that some day, women will feel okay just being by themselves, or that walking home at night alone won’t feel like a fatal mistake.

Here are the arrays of things that happened to me in this fine city of Montreal:

  • While walking home at night with my partner, a man on a bike called me an “Asian whore” as he rode by.
  • One time, when I was walking home alone, a man followed me home for about 8 blocks. Luckily, a friend that was staying at my apartment at the time was waiting outside for me and I got inside without the dude following me any longer. When I got inside, he made the “eating out” gesture at me. When I told the security guard of my building to not let the man in that night, he just said to me: “he just likes you!” I felt faint.

Recalling these incidents makes me feel angry. Yet, when those things were happening, all I could sense was pure fear, which made me only want to flee the scene and not confront it. When I was aware of that man following me home, I ran a few scenarios in my  head where he would force me to come inside the apartment with me. Then all of my desire to yell at him evaporated, because God forbid I anger him any more. What if he would want to punish me for my behaviour? And because I have been socialized and educated to believe my own helplessness, this is what happened in my head:

(Except, you know, it only became funny in hindsight.)

The crippling fear of men who are stronger and bigger than me makes me hate myself, because I feel like a silent accomplice who allows these terrible things to happen to me by fulfilling the helpless woman stereotype. Or even worse, a meek Asian woman stereotype. (Racialicious has an excellent piece about street harassment and race)

I wish the first response that comes to mind when someone approaches me in an aggressive manner is not to run, but to confront it and make that person feel bad for what (s)he is doing. I’m not sure when or if I’ll reach the stage where I will be confident enough to confront the situation. But I’m working on it. The other day, when a man told me my dress was pretty and asked whether I was from “China or Hong Kong” I said “no thanks” while looking straight into his eyes. It’s a small step.

Links Roundup: The Election

If you’re in Canada, you know (or you should know) that there is an upcoming federal election. In my opinion, his election campaign has been a particularly disappointing one for two reasons. First, there is a definite lack of issues being discussed (aboriginal issues? cuts to culture funding? women’s issues? WHERE ARE THEY?).

Second, because of the blatant hypocrisy of the Conservatives the Conservatives have been circulating the word “ethnic vote” for awhile now. Schema Magazine asked the question “WTF is the Ethnic Vote?” which got me thinking about the particular issue and the election in general.

The first issue at hand is the inappropriate broadness of the word “ethnic vote.” When Jason Kenney sent out his original note with the phrase used, he really meant the South Asian community. But instead, he chose to use a rather loaded term for Canadian politics; in 1995, when the sovereignty referendum in Quebec resulted in a “no” (very barely), the premier and separatist Jacques Parizeau blamed it on “money and the ethnic vote.”

Semantics aside, this shameless pandering to the “ethnic vote” is eye-roll inducing on other sides, too. For majority of the time, people of colour are swept under the rug, or only brought up when they’re deemed a problem – or a potential source of gain for the white man. It is also insulting to see the so-called effort of “wooing” ethnic votes, which apparently involves telling people of colour to dress up in their ethnic costumes for a photo-op of Stephen Harper. This is tokenism at its worst. (As an Asian-Canadian, my options would’ve been pretty varied too, like this one, or this one.)

What might people of colour gain from all of this? Turns out, not very much. The Conservative platform on immigration is woefully lacking when it comes to welcoming immigrants or refugees, and only detailed in areas of deporting immigrants or cracking down on “human trafficking”. The one incentive for newly arrived immigrants they do offer is a “foreign credentials loans program” that will help immigrants “upgrade their skills for use in Canada.” So those immigrants still need to pay to be re-educated out of their own pockets. (All of the quotes are from the Conservative Party platform)

Moreover, a group of legal scholars have found that while the “Harper government” is busy trying to convince people of colour that the Conservative government is on their side, the reality is pretty much the opposite. Some of the highlighted statistics include: quotas for sponsored parents and grandparents are down, and it takes longer time for refugees to reunite with their families.

And let’s not forget about women’s issues. The Conservative government has been slashing funds to women’s groups left and right, while also telling women that their votes matter. Here’s a list of women’s groups that have lost their funding during Harper’s time as Prime Minister. I am glad, however, that voters everywhere are speaking out against these measures.

So what is the Harper government doing, exactly? It is paying lip service to my ethnicity and my gender, while secretly making the lives of people belonging in my “identity brackets” harder. It all feels rather disingenuous and unfair.

So yes, I will be voting in this election against the problematic messages of Stephen Harper and this government, and I would like to encourage all the young people of colour voters to do the same. Here are some useful links for educating and humouring yourselves this election:

-Globe and Mail’s summary of the party platforms 

-Canada Votes 2011: CBC’s election coverage

-Schema Magazine to see various people’s reactions on the “ethnic vote” issue. Vancouver writer Beth Hong also weighed in on this issue.

-Vintage Voter, featuring priceless photos of the party leaders in their youthful glory.

-Stephen Harper Looking at Things, a hilarious photoblog of Stephen Harper looking at different things (inspired by Kim Jong-Il Looking at Things).

What makes a nation “cool”?

[originally posted on Schema Magazine]

CNNGo, CNN’s beta site that focuses on 6 Asian cities (Bangkok, Hong Kong, Mumbai, Shanghai, Singapore and Tokyo), recently published a list of the world’s 12 coolest nationalities. Some nations on the list include: Botswana (no. 8), Singapore (no. 2), Jamaica (no.3), and Brazil at the top spot.

Japan came in 7th in CNNGo's "coolest nationalities" list.

On the one hand, it’s neat to see a list of “cool” countries that isn’t Eurocentric (Belgium and Spain are the only European countries that made the list, as opposed to the usual appearance of the French or the Italians when one thinks of “cool” or “fashionable” people) Given CNNGo’s focus on Asian cities, it’s no surprise that half of the nationalities on this list are Asian.

But overall, I’m not sure how I feel about this list. It starts off as a satirical piece bordering on problematic (Belgians and Turks are cool because of their broken English and funny names! Mongolians are cool because they wear fur everything!). The writer does try to balance out the problematic factor by condemning some of the more obvious mishaps, such as the Spanish soccer team’s “slant-eyed ‘tribute’ to China in 2008.” However, such efforts are counter-balanced by glib references to the high number of citizens living with AIDS as “uncool” in Botswana.

The list also grossly trivializes some of the political turmoil that happens in many of these locations. One commenter notes on Brazil’s #1 cool status: “The majority of the people of our biggest city, São Paulo, (no, isn’t Rio de Janeiro as many people think) work hard everyday an [sic] suffer from the summer floods.”

Despite the problems, the list manages to spark a nice discussion around the question of what exactly does it mean to be “cool”? What I learned from this is that there is no singular idea of “cool.” Brazillians are cool because they’re good at soccer and have samba. But Singaporeans are cool because they’re good at Internet-related things, and have a 10-year-old protégé who is very good at computer programming already. The Spaniards are cool because they’re the life of the party. Maybe articles like this can and do have merit about diversifying the idea of what makes a country “cool” – I just wish it could be done a little more thoughtfully the next time.

You can check out the full list at cnngo.com.

Links Friday:Canada almost does the right thing, China’s fake marriage market, and cool women doing cool things

So, Canada had a small milestone when the House of Commons passed a bill that would amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code to protect transsexual and transgender people. Awesome, right? Except that it’s going to be defeated in the Senate with its Conservative majority. Ugh.

Melissa Bull (who I interviewed for the “Women In Art” series some time ago) writes a sharp and FUNNY counterpiece to Leah McLaren and calls out her essentialist B.S.

This fascinating Slate piece looks into Shanghai’s marriage of convenience market for lesbian and gay Chinese – some heartbreaking details about the pressure to keep up a heteronormative “front” from both gay husbands, lesbian wives, and the abandoned wives of gay men (interestingly though, there’s no mention of abandoned husbands of lesbian women). This was brought to my attention by Christine of Shanghai Shiok!, who, prior to committing to a jet-setting life and starting her popular blog, attended university with me in a sleepy Ontario town in what seems like ages ago.

Two summers ago, I made a supercool feminist friend in Chicoutimi, QC, of all places. She recently started UBC Bike Co-op’s Women’s Night . If you’re in Vancouver and are into bikes and cool women, you should totally check it out.

My first outfit photo was featured in the Blue Collar Collective series, for putting together an outfit for less than $100. I think the best-looking outfit goes to It’s Sewstastic, Mama! for refashioning a large, nondescript winter coat into a one-of-a-kind gem.

Finally, it feels wrong to end this recap without mentioning Egypt. Here are some stunning photos from the protests.

Not all Chinese parents are the same

Dear Amy Chua,

I’ve been really rattled by your article, “Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior.” And judging from the comments section, I’m not alone.

First, you admit that you are using the term “Chinese parent” loosely:

“I know some Korean, Indian, Jamaican, Irish and Ghanaian parents who qualify too. Conversely, I know some mothers of Chinese heritage, almost always born in the West, who are not Chinese mothers, by choice or otherwise. I’m also using the term “Western parents” loosely. Western parents come in all varieties.”

Okay, fine. But then you continue to wrongly use the words “Chinese parents” in your entire article, instead of individualizing your own experiences, or perhaps some Chinese parents you know. Is it too hard to give these people a name, or at least acknowledge people’s individuality? Apparently it is.

So you are exemplifying the classic move where one person of colour represents everyone in that “group.” While admitting that setting up binaries is inaccurate, you continue to do so in your entire article, thus perpetuating stereotypes about the shrill, emotionless Chinese parents while also reinforcing the wishy-washy Western parents stereotype. (even though you state at the beginning that you know such stereotypes are not all true.) You can’t say that you know the dangers of stereotypes and then move on to reinforce them.

I also wonder why you keep using the word “Chinese” parents, and fail to acknowledge the difference between a “Chinese” parent, and a “Chinese-American” parent. I wish you could’ve perhaps explored this difference further, because I can’t help but think that 2nd-or 3rd-generation Chinese-Americans who were born here may be different. Some Chinese-Americans have been living in America for a long time now. What are their stories? Could you not find a single 3rd-generation parent who was willing to share his/her story of bringing up children? When I read an article – in a respected publication like the Wall Street Journal nonetheless – I expect to see some kind of journalistic practices like concrete research, some differing perspectives, and maybe some interviews. Your article has none of these things – just some unknown studies with no source , countless anecdotes about your own family, and some more generalizations about how in the end, the Chinese parents produce the best children. How odd. How disappointing.

Let me recount the days of my teenage years. My parents, who immigrated here over 10 years ago, had high expectations for me as well. As a teenager who was confused about her identity, I did experience a lot of conflict and resented my parents (and the unreal expectations they put on me). But you know what? They were also human, not the caricatures of parents you described in your article. They let me major in English Literature because I wanted to. They let me quit my violin lessons because I didn’t like it.

But most importantly, I didn’t grow up thinking that all Korean parents were like my own. Because they are not. I also saw plenty of my “Western” friends suffer from the parents’ pressure to go into engineering/law school/medical school because their parents had the same profession and they wouldn’t expect their children to do anything else.

However, according to you, Western parents don’t do that:

“Western parents try to respect their children’s individuality, encouraging them to pursue their true passions, supporting their choices, and providing positive reinforcement and a nurturing environment. By contrast, the Chinese believe that the best way to protect their children is by preparing them for the future, letting them see what they’re capable of, and arming them with skills, work habits and inner confidence that no one can ever take away.”

I still fail to see how an action like this can instill confidence in a child:

“I threatened her [Chua's daughter] with no lunch, no dinner, no Christmas or Hanukkah presents, no birthday parties for two, three, four years. When she still kept playing it wrong, I told her she was purposely working herself into a frenzy because she was secretly afraid she couldn’t do it. I told her to stop being lazy, cowardly, self-indulgent and pathetic.”

I don’t think you can excuse this behaviour as being “cultural.” Nobody knows their parents as well as the children, so I’m withholding judgment, but this anecdote does make you seem like a bullying parent with issues. So please, do not drag an entire nation of parents with you. This issue of unreal expectations is yours to figure out, and yours alone.

Maybe, if you approached this article with a more nuanced approach about class – do upper-middle class parents tend to pressure their children into certain types of activities and professions, compared to those belonging to socioeconomically challenged groups? – then perhaps this article wouldn’t have become so problematic.

You say that the Chinese parents are the best in the world. But it sure doesn’t sound like it until I read your statement telling me so. And unfortunately, I fear that people without Chinese parents will just wonder how crazy those Chinese parents are after reading your piece. And those of us with Chinese (or other Asian parents, because the distinction still doesn’t really exist in our society) will just end up cringing at the problematic lumping of the “Chinese” parents like there’s some magical personality binding agent in our DNAs, even across the continent!

And for that, I feel deeply disappointed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 942 other followers

%d bloggers like this: